From the Lab: Easy to Read, Easy to Believe

In a recent blog post, we saw that when instructions for a task were presented in a font that was easy to read, people thought the task would be significantly easier.

In an earlier study by the same researcher, Norbert Schwarz (this time working with Rolf Reber), they found that when statements were presented in colors that were easy to read (i.e., dark blue vs. yellow on a white background), people were significantly more likely to judge them as being true.

For example,

“Osorno is in Chile.”

is significantly easier to read than

“Osorno is in Chile.”

and as a result, the former is more likely to be judged as true.

Once again, this finding underscores the importance of making your presentations easy to understand—in this case, by making your visuals easy to see.

From the Lab: Easy to Read, Easy to Do

In a 2008 study, Hyunjin Song and Norbert Schwarz found that when instructions for a task are presented in a font that is difficult to read, readers believe that the task will take significantly more time to complete and are significantly less motivated to attempt it.

This underscores the importance of making your presentations easy to understand, particularly when you are asking your audience to do something. (This principle applies to both your words and your visual aids—all parts of your presentation, really.) When the audience finds it difficult to understand your presentation, this will cause them to view what you’re asking them to do as more difficult, and they will be significantly less likely do it. On the other hand, if you make everything easy to understand, your audience will think what you’re asking them to do is easier, and they will be significantly more likely to do it.


Note: In a followup study in 2009, Song and Schwarz found that when the names of food additives or amusement park rides were hard to pronounce, they were perceived as riskier than those with names that were easy to pronounce.